Saturday, August 15, 2009

Syllabus—JCOM 2010 Media Smarts

.
SYLLABUS
JCOM 2010
MEDIA SMARTS
Making Sense of the Information Age



Professor Ted Pease (ted.pease@usu.edu)
Department of Journalism & Communication
Utah State University
Spring 2010

• Email: Ted.Pease@usu.edu
• Website: Blackboard; Blog: Media Smarts—JCOM 2010 (additional materials at AskDrTed)
• Required Text: John McManus, Detecting Bull: How to Identify Bias and Junk in Print, Broadcast and on the Wild Web (www.gradethenews.org, 2009) Purchase (or “rent”) online. Go to the Detecting Bull website and click on “BUY” link at left. Follow the directions. Permanent copy of entire book: $23.95. Temporary copy (18 weeks): $14.95.
• Other Resources: Look at the INDEX on Smarts blog. See also Today’s WORD on Journalism and AskDrTed; postings on “Teddy TV” on Blackboard.
• Office: 308B Animal Science (435-797-3293)

Preamble: Wise Guys

1. Whose Reality?
“I don’t fret about TV because it’s decadent or shortens your attention span or leads to murder. It worries me because it alters perception. TV, and the culture it anchors, masks
and drowns out the subtle and vital information that
contact with the real world once provided.”
Bill McKibben, author, The Age of Missing Information, 1993

2. Critical Thinking
“Question Authority!” –1970s slogan

3. The Power of Words
“Words are sacred. They deserve respect.
If you get the right ones, in the right order, you can nudge the world a little.”
Tom Stoppard, playwright, 1967

4. How Do We Know What We (Think We) Know?
“I believe television is going to be the test of the modern world,
and that in this new opportunity to see beyond the range of our vision we shall discover
either a new and unbearable disturbance of the general peace, or a saving radiance in the sky. We shall stand or fall by television—of that I am quite sure.”
E.B. White, author, 1938

• • • • •

What we’ll do:
Welcome to Media Smarts, where we try to equip you to make sense of the information age—journalism, movies, advertising, books, TV, the Internet, radio. Some issues we’ll explore:

1) We’re being lied to, boys and girls.
2) The way we are told to see the world is not necessarily the way it really is.
3) Trying to operate in a free and participatory democracy without accurate knowledge and information is like piloting a boat through the fog without radar or GPS.

The central question driving Media Smarts is this: How do we know what we (think we) know about _____________? (the economy? Iraq? Ryan Seacrest? Hillary Clinton? Hair care? fill in the blank).

In this information age (which author Bill McKibben said should more correctly be termed an age of missed information), nearly every waking moment is somehow affected by the mass media, which teach us to see the world in particular ways. The media teach us to value certain lifestyles and norms and to reject others; to desire certain products—food, cars, gadgets, political candidates; how to perceive different groups of people based on their gender, racial background, skin color, height, weight, or religion.

This constant diet of mass media images and values skews how we as individuals and we as a society see and understand the world.

The goal of this course is to help you see past the mass media’s version of the world, and to give you the analytical and critical thinking skills you’ll need to make sense of the world for yourself.

During the semester, we will critically explore whether, when, how, and to what extent the mass media—both news and entertainment—can influence people’s worldview and events, focusing on how mass media messages can cultivate perceptions, perspectives and attitudes, particularly in areas of gender, racial diversity, violence, children, and as regards how Americans “know” their own history. We’ll start with general principles of media literacy, and then focus specifically on how the mass media present “reality”—political, social and cultural.

Course Goals: To expand students’ recognition of the role of mass media versions of “truth,” and their critical thinking and analytical skills to make them more savvy consumers of mass media. In particular, the course will ask students to analyze and evaluate various mass media versions of historical events, cultural norms, and individuals in society.

The core question for this course is, How do we know what we know about the world and the people and events in it, and how sure we are of those “facts”?

We will examine the unique and essential social interaction between the individual and the mass media:
a) How do mass media—from newspapers to TV and radio to Hollywood and the Internet—frame the world and the people in it?
b) How does this affect the press, culture, societies and participatory democracy?
c) What stories about cultural norms (race, gender, society, politics, etc.) are told?
d) And how do we learn to “see” and understand the world through such lessons?

Children, of course, are the most susceptible victims of media images and messages. Humor columnist Erma Bombeck once said, “In general, my children refuse to eat anything that hasn’t danced on television.”

Most Americans under the age of 50 were raised on such a diet; the world has been created for us, and isn’t real unless we’ve seen it on the tube, or on YouTube. In predicting more than 40 years ago how the information age would change the world, Canadian sociologist Marshall McLuhan used the analogy of a fish. He said he didn’t know who discovered water, but he was fairly certain it wasn’t a fish.


Hunh?

Well, like fish, McLuhan suggested, most residents of the information age are equally unsuspecting and uncritical about the mass media environment in which they live. We eat TV, we breathe news, we absorb advertising and cultural attitudes through our gills.

This represents an enormous responsibility both for the producers of mass media messages, and for the individuals who consume them.

As beat-era poet Allen Ginsberg said, “Whoever controls the media, the images, controls the culture.” The fundamental assumption of Media Smarts is that most of us are so accustomed to the mass mediated world of the 21st century that we don’t even notice the environment in which we live, the mass media diet that we consume and digest, and which becomes part of what and who we are, and how we think about and perceive the world.

“Television tends to be the main centerpiece in our culture,” says Professor Gary Edgerton. “TV in a sense creates instant history . . . that shapes how we think about an event.”

Even beyond the sit-com or reality show fads, Edgerton asserts, most Americans know what they think they “know” about historical events and people from how they are depicted and framed in TV or movies. For example, students can “understand” the events of Pearl Harbor only with Ben Affleck in the middle of them.

Many Americans “know” what they (think they) know about the death of President John F. Kennedy from Oliver Stone’s movie. The story of D-Day is told by Tom Hanks going ashore at Normandy to find a soldier named Private Ryan.

This is how many college students today “know” the world. I believe that today’s students—you guys—are so steeped in mass media that you need remedial skills to help you recognize how entertainment media affect perceptions of both current and historical “reality.”

Media content-producers—which means not only newspapers and Hollywood producers, but anyone with an Internet connection—decide what to include and exclude, what to highlight or downplay. They make such choices to achieve their own goals, which may transcend simple things like “truth” and “facts.”

“Truth” is in the eye and mind of the beholder—often diluted, distorted and even fabricated by the media to sell you something, to privilege social class, to distort gender and race, and otherwise to reshape social reality.

In the process, in a mass media marketplace that has become more “real” for most Americans than reality itself, the stories we tell and the stories we learn through films, TV and more broadly in popular culture pre-empt truth, and reshape reality for most American media consumers.

In Media Smarts, students also will examine the various contemporaneous economic, political, and cultural environment that influence the ways in which society is depicted and limited by the mass media. By the end of the semester, students will have practiced critical and analytical skills in several areas that will help them become more critical consumers of all media products.

Texts and course materials:
Because this course exists within a context of journalism and the role and performance of the press and the mass media, our readings will generally be assigned as “new media”—online articles or other materials placed on the class website.

Aside from assigned online readings, which you will find listed from week to week on the blog, you will need a CD “book,” which you can purchase or “rent” for the semester:

• John McManus, Detecting Bull: How to Identify Bias and Junk in Print, Broadcast and on the Wild Web (www.gradethenews.org, 2009) The e-book can be purchased at the Detecting Bull website for these rates: Permanent copy of entire book: $23.95. Temporary copy (18 weeks): $14.95.

Go to there immediately and get it. You’ll need a computer with Adobe Flash.

Other assignments will be posted at through Blackboard, which will take you to the weekly assignments on the Media Smarts blog, with other stuff linked to AskDrTed.

Assignments and Grading: (Subject to change)
This is a critical thinking course. It’s also a talking and writing course. Students will present their thoughts on the mass media and the readings in weekly posts in the discussion area (which we’ll call “SmartTalk”) of Blackboard. Details on this requirement to follow.
Other stuff:
1. Quizzes on readings/news 25 pts
2. Critical essays/reaction papers or blog projects 10 pts/20 pts
3. SmartTalk participation 15 pts
4. Midterm Exam 15 pts
5. Final Exam 15 pts
Total = 100 pts

Critical Essays: Two short (750 wds) essays—or, alternatively, create a blog—on assigned topics.
SmartTalk: Every week you will encounter readings or come across stuff on your own that push your buttons about the intersection of mass media and your life. When this happens, I want you to post your rants on that week’s assignment site on the blog (for example, click here the Week1 posting—if there were something that you wanted to rant about, you would click on “comments” and write your rant in the little box. You can “comment as” there either using your gmail address (or aggiemail, I think), or anonymously). You can comment on the readings, on Today’s WORD on Journalism (which you will receive daily) or on anything else that strikes you in the media. I expect you to comment substantively (more than, “Yeah! I agree!”) at least 10 times during the semester, both initiating your own subjects and responding to others’ rants. Check Week1 and I’ll give you an example.
Exams: Comprehensive midterm and final exams. Short answer and essays.
Other grading issues: The instructor takes no prisoners when it comes to writing, grammar, spelling, mechanics, etc. Fair warning. Obviously, DEADLINES ARE ABSOLUTE. That’s why they’re called deadlines. In the real world, missing deadlines means you don't get in the paper; in this class, missing deadline means zero for the assignment.

Housekeeping Details:
Some cautions, instructions and threats. Ask anyone; Pease is an irascible old poop and can be testy at times.

Academic Honesty: The University expects students and faculty alike to maintain the highest standards of academic honesty (for a complete definition, see University Catalogue or the Code of Policies and Procedures for Students at Utah State University, Article V, Section 3). The policy states:

“[C]heating, falsification or plagiarism can result in warning, grade reduction, probation, suspension, expulsion, payment of damages, withholding of transcripts, withholding of degrees, removal a class, performance of community service, referral to appropriate counseling" or other penalties as the university judiciary may deem appropriate.

Because public trust and personal credibility are essential to journalists and other professional communicators, I adhere to the JCOM department’s zero-tolerance policy regarding academic dishonesty: Cheaters fail the class and are expelled from the JCOM major. As per the USU Student Code, any documented form of academic dishonesty—including plagiarism—will result in an automatic F in the course and a report to the dean of the college and the USU vice president for student services. If you have questions about what’s acceptable work under strict codes of academic honesty, see the USU Code of Policies and Procedures for Students, or consult your professor. Any suspicious work may be submitted to a web database. For guidance on plagiarism and how to avoid it, see this website.

Decorum: It’s a funny thing about email and other online communication—people often type things that they would NEVER say in a face-to-face setting. So please read your emails out loud to yourselves (this also will help with typos and stoopid language) and count to 10 before sending or posting. We’re all in this together. That means that we will need each other in order to succeed. And that means that everyone is expected to treat everyone else with fairness, courtesy and honesty. Central to this subject matter is the willingness to examine our own beliefs and how we arrived at them, and to acknowledge that others may see the world differently. So I hope we all will be able to express and consider opinions collegially, in the spirit of open inquiry. Let us agree to disagree, if necessary, and to accommodate contrarian viewpoints and differing perspectives. Disruptive or abusive behavior will not be tolerated.

Disclaimer: The instructor has no desire to offend anyone’s personal or cultural beliefs, and he apologizes in advance if he does so inadvertently. But students should be aware that journalism (and advanced education) often deals with issues and content that some may find disagreeable—from profanity and offensive attitudes and perspectives that may make you uncomfortable. But that’s the business or examining society and becoming media-savvy and making sense of the world. It’s a critically important job for every citizen of a free society. Please do tell me if you have problems with any of the material, and we will try to accommodate if possible.

Finally, any rumors that you may have heard that Professor Pease is a heartless, obdurate, irritable, demanding, tough, pugnacious, unpleasant SOB probably falls short (and wide) of the truth. The fact is that I will press you hard this semester to develop an advanced level of critical thinking and analysis required for success in the information age. But if you're having a problem—with this class or anything else—please feel free to call or email me, or for those of you on-campus, come find me in my office, for a talk, a coke, career advice, a crying towel or whatever.



§ § §

SCHEDULE
The advantage to online courses is that you can do the work as your schedule permits, and in your pajamas if you want. In fact, Professor Pease may be in his jammies even now (picture that! Well, actually, don’t....). But you do have to complete the assignments when they are due. Students who wait until the end of the semester to submit everything in a pile will flunk.

The weekly assignments will appear as a single hotlink (ex: Week 1...) on Blackboard, linking to details on the Media Smarts blog. There is an INDEX link in the upper lefthand corner of the main blog page, and the week-by-week links also appear in that column. There’s a lot of other fabulous stuff there, too, for the curious or bored.

SmartTalk: Comment/kibbitz/rant regularly on the blog. Sometimes Professor Pease will start a thread. Sometimes the WORD will push your buttons (like this one, which makes me CRAZY....) Everyone must initiate a substantive thread on the readings or a current media issue, as well as comment/respond substantively to someone else’s post.
Quizzes will be posted periodically on readings. Details to follow.
The Midterm Exam will be no later than Week 8 (Feb. 28). I’ll give you fair warning.
Other Key Dates: Click here for USU calendar.

§ § §

JCOM 2010 (online edition)—Media Smarts Schedule F09 (subject to change)

NOTE: Here’s a start on our readings schedule, which I will add to after Week 4, and may change before then. You should check the online syllabus and the Weekly links regularly
for updates—this is
your responsibility.

WEEK 1 January 11
• Get acquainted with our Blackboard site and the Media Smarts blog.
• Read “First Thing—Read This!” orientation posts and syllabus closely.
• Order McManus CD online at Detecting Bull.
• For inspiration as you start the school year, watch this five-minute video from Steven Colbert, on professors’ unreasonable expectation that you learn to think critically.
• When you have read the introductory materials, send Professor Pease an email message at ted.pease@usu.edu introducing yourself, and with any questions you may have. Send me this email by Friday 1/15 so I know you’re in the class and that you know how to get around Blackboard and the blog.
Quiz on syllabus will be posted on the blog on Thursday. Copy it into an email and send it to Professor Pease at ted.pease@usu.edu by Saturday midnight.
Students file introductions of themselves in “comments” under the “About Us” post on the blog. Tell us a bit about yourself: Who you are, age, hometown, what kinds of stuff you like to do, what you want to do when you grow up, one weird/funny thing you’ve done. I’ll start with my own self-disclosure. Look at each other’s posts to get to know your classmates.
.
WEEK 2 Jan. 17
How Do We Know What We Think We Know?
READINGS:
• McManus, Intro Chapter (pp. 1-4)
• Reading: What Is Media Smarts? “Media Smarts—Making Sense of the Information Age,” by Ted Pease & Brenda Cooper
Mediated America—Myths from the Mass Media Click here or on “Mediated America” in the index list at left and select your best answers. This doesn’t “count,” so have fun—involve your family or friends if you want, and see what you come up with. Don’t send it back to me: I will post the answers and a “Teddy TV” video on Blackboard by Friday, 1/22.
• SmartTalk on blog: Discuss any of the readings or the “Myths” quiz.
• Quiz.

WEEK 3 January 24
READINGS: Media Literacy
• “What is media literacy?
• “Some principles of media literacy” and Handout: Some Principles of Media Literacy
Lecture: Media Literacy—How do we know what we think we know? (Note: These are the lecture notes. Lecture will be available as “TeddyTV” BB).
Click here to view Billy Joel and student Ye Li’s take on 50 Years of History in Pictures.
• SmartTalk on blog (below).
• Quiz

WEEK 4 January 31
READINGS:
Mass Communication Theories
• McManus, Ch. 2 (pp. 1-10) & Other readings for the Truthiness Project
• Read Pease’s column about McLuhan’s Fish
Readings on Press Performance: NOTE: These readings will provide you with context and background for your first project on Truth vs. Truthiness, which will be due Monday, Feb. 22.
• Where the News Comes From -- And Why It Matters
• 29% - Say Press is Generally Accurate
• Press Accuracy Rating Hits Two Decade Low
• The Wikiback Effect: If you’re a journalist who cribs from Wikipedia, it will get you back.
• “Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand”
• “How to detect bias in news media” (#1)
• “How to detect bias in news” (#2)
• Fox News is cable champ
• “Seek and Ye Shall Find: How to Evaluate Sources on the Web”
Book Review: How the Bush White House Handled the Press

“Truth v. Truthiness”

• “Is Jon Stewart the Most Trusted Man in America?”
• “Young adults eschew traditional nightly news for ‘The Daily Show’”
• “What the Mainstream Media Can Learn From Jon Stewart”
• It’s official: “The Daily Show” really is “the most important television program EVER”
• Now that Walter Cronkite has passed on, who is America's most trusted newscaster?
• Jon Stewart: The new most trusted man in America?
• In Jon We Trust
• NBC’s Brian Williams: Why Jon Stewart Is Good For News
• Beck's Misinformer of the Year defense rests on falsehoods
• SmartTalk on readings and course content
• Quiz
Teddy TV on Mass Comm Theories (on Blackboard—to be announced)

WEEK 5 February 7
READINGS: Journalism Ethics—NOT an Oxymoron! A Free & Responsible Press
• McManus, Ch. 3 “The Trouble with Truth”
Codes of Ethics
• Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics
• “Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct, Radio-Television News Directors Association”
• Principles of Journalism
• Public Relations Society of America Member Code of Ethics
• Code of Ethics of Al Jazeera
• Guidelines for a Free & Responsible Press (The Hutchins Commission & its Antecedents)
• “Ask These 10 Questions to Make Good Ethical Decisions”
Media Ownership & Consolidation
• The Clout of Media Giants
• Media Giants
• SmartTalk on blog
• Quiz

WEEK 6 February 14
This week we continue our pursuit of truth as you put together your Truthiness Projects (due Monday, Feb. 22!)
READINGS: Detecting Bull, Ch. 6: “If Not Objectivity, What Standard Should We Hold News Providers to?” and Ch. 7: “How to Detect Bias in News and Opinion Articles”
ALSO:
Essay: On Objectivity, By Dr. Ted
Principles of Journalism
Would-Be Political Candidates Get Bully Pulpit on TV “News”
• Revisit the News Bias articles from FAIR and the Media Awareness Network (Week 4)
• Revisit Glenn Beck: “Misinformer of the Year”?
• SmartTalk on week’s readings.
• Quiz

WEEK 7 February 21
• SmartTalk—Comments on readings and course content.
• Quiz

WEEK 8 February 28
• SmartTalk—Comments on readings and course content.
• Midterm Exam

WEEK 9 March 7
• SmartTalk—Comments on readings and course content.
• Quiz

Spring Break March 14-20

WEEK 10 March 21
• SmartTalk—Comments on readings and course content.
• Quiz

WEEK 11 March 28
• SmartTalk—Comments on readings and course content.
• Quiz

WEEK 12 April 4
• SmartTalk—Comments on readings and course content.
• Quiz

WEEK 13 April 11
• SmartTalk—Comments on readings and course content.
• Quiz

WEEK 14 April 18
• SmartTalk—Comments on readings and course content.
• Quiz

WEEK 15 April 25
• SmartTalk—Comments on readings and course content.
• Quiz

WEEK 16 May 2
FINAL EXAM details to be announced.
.

No comments:

Post a Comment